🔗 Share this article

The recent US national security strategy offers a flawed view of the European Union. It claims that unrestrained immigration and what it terms "progressive" agendas represent an existential threat to European civilization. Yet, this perspective rests on a fundamental misreading of the situation. The actual danger confronting Europe is not societal but technological and economic lag.

The Stark Growth Divide Separating the US and Europe

Statistics paint a stark picture. From 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by 87%, while a mere thirteen and a half percent growth for the European Union. Over this period, European income per person fell from over three-quarters to just 50% of the US level. Remarkably, even Mississippi now has a greater average income than several leading EU nations like Italy and France.

Currently, roughly 50% of the global top fifty tech companies are American, while a mere four are European.

The Technological Shortfall: The Core Problem

The growing disparity is driven by stronger productivity growth in the US, fueled by breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The scene of world technology leadership is overwhelmingly American. Over the past fifty years, hundreds of American startups have scaled into enterprises valued at more than ten billion dollars, versus just 14 in Europe.

This gap raises a pressing question: As the competition for future industries like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, what is the EU positioned? Most analysts agree it is essentially a contest between two between the US and China, with European nations entering at a clear disadvantage.

Root Causes of the Continent's Innovation Gap

A number of key reasons explain this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a far deeper and more dynamic network for financing new ventures. Europe still lacks a true unified investment market, a factor that limits the scale of emerging companies.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Excessive and fragmented regulation hamper European business. A American entrepreneur can introduce a service under a single regulatory framework to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a larger population, is divided among twenty-seven separate regimes, creating significant market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Attitudes toward risk-taking differ sharply. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was once viewed with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. The continent's long-term lack of spending in defense has weakened its ability in breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Grounds for Hopefulness

In spite of these challenges, one can find reasons for optimism. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have started to advance substantial change. Notable analyses on EU competitiveness and the single market highlight the need for major reforms.

Given appropriate incentives and rule changes, these assets might enable far greater levels of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe retains significant strengths: high-quality human capital, excellent schools and universities, and premier labs. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these elements have the potential to trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Crucially, even if the EU does not take the lead in creating cutting-edge tech, it can still dramatically increase economic output by adopting and adapting advancements from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

Europe now faces a decisive crossroads. As the saying goes, decline often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, Europe's slide in innovation has been steady. But, without decisive action to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could give way to a sudden and irreversible decline in global economic relevance.